
Fruit and vegetable packaging plays a crucial role across the entire fresh produce supply chain. Beyond simple containment, packaging influences product freshness, transportation safety, visual presentation, and consumer purchasing decisions. With the widespread adoption of thermoforming technology, selecting the right plastic sheet material—particularly for clamshells, trays, and hinged containers—has become a key factor for produce brands, packaging factories, and exporters.
Among the various thermoforming materials, PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) and RPET (Recycled PET) have emerged as the dominant choices due to their balance of safety, clarity, strength, and environmental sustainability.
This comprehensive guide provides a detailed comparison of PET, RPET, PP, PS, and PLA, helping you choose the ideal material for fruit and vegetable packaging according to performance, cost, and regulatory considerations.
Key Functional Requirements of Fruit & Vegetable Packaging
Before selecting a thermoforming material, it is important to understand the functional needs of fresh produce packaging.
1. Freshness and Breathability
- Condensation control
- Optional ventilation holes for berries and tomatoes
- High-clarity packaging helps consumers evaluate freshness
2. Strength and Stacking Performance
Packaging must withstand:
- Transportation pressure
- Cold-chain logistics
- Long-distance export
- Retail shelf stacking
3. Food-Grade Safety
- BPA-free
- No migration of harmful chemicals
- Approved for direct food contact
4. Branding and Product Display
High transparency and gloss are crucial, especially for:
- Strawberries
- Blueberries
- Grapes
- Cherry tomatoes
5. Global Sustainability Trends
Governments and supermarkets increasingly demand:
- Recyclable materials
- Lower carbon footprint
- Post-consumer recycled content
PET and RPET align well with these requirements, making them the leading choices for modern produce packaging.
Comparison of Common Thermoforming Materials (PET, RPET, PP, PS, PLA)
1. PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate)
Advantages:
- Extremely high clarity (up to 90% light transmission)
- Excellent strength and rigidity
- Suitable for refrigeration
- Food-safe and globally accepted
- Fully recyclable
Best for: Premium transparent clamshells, hinged boxes, berry containers.

2. RPET (Recycled PET)
Advantages:
- Produced from recycled PET bottles
- Lower carbon footprint and energy consumption
- Meets circular economy guidelines
- Cost lower than virgin PET
- Widely accepted by EU & US supermarket chains
Slight differences:
- Transparency slightly lower (depending on grade)
- Available in A-grade (high clarity) or B-grade (slight gray tone)
Best for: Export-oriented produce packaging, sustainable brands.

3. GAG (PETG–APET–PETG) Co-extruded Sheets
Advantages:
- Superior Thermoforming Performance
- High Clarity and Gloss
- Excellent Toughness and Impact Strength
- Food-Grade and Safe
- Cost-Effective Compared to 100% PETG
Best for:
- Deep fruit trays
- Hinged boxes requiring flexible hinges
- Packaging with aggressive forming ratios
- Premium-grade produce boxes demanding clarity + strength

4. PP (Polypropylene)
Advantages:
- Flexible, tough, cost-efficient
- Microwave-safe
- Good heat resistance
Limitations:
- Lower transparency
- Less suitable for premium display packaging
Best for: Vegetable trays, microwaveable ready-meal packaging.

5. PS (Polystyrene)
Advantages:
- Good rigidity
- Lowest cost
Limitations:
- Brittle and crack-prone
- Falling out of favor due to food safety concerns
Best for: Budget applications; less recommended for fresh produce.

6. PLA (Polylactic Acid)
Advantages:
- Fully biodegradable
- Excellent for eco-label branding
Limitations:
- Higher cost
- Limited heat-resistance and cold-chain performance
Best for: Markets with strict compostable requirements.
Comprehensive Thermoforming Material Comparison Table
(PET / RPET / GAG / PP / PS / PLA)
| Material | Transparency | Thermoforming Performance | Impact Strength | Food Safety | Cold-Chain Suitability | Sustainability | Cost Level | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET | ★★★★★ (Excellent) | ★★★★☆ (Stable forming, good wall distribution) | ★★★★☆ | FDA / EU approved | Excellent | Recyclable (rPET stream) | Medium | Berry clamshells, fruit boxes, clear trays |
| RPET | ★★★★☆ (High, slightly gray tone) | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ | FDA-grade available | Excellent | High (PCR content, low carbon footprint) | Low–Medium | Export packaging, sustainable fruit containers |
| GAG (PETG–APET–PETG) | ★★★★★ (Crystal clear) | ★★★★★ (Deep forming, complex shapes) | ★★★★★ | Food-grade | Excellent | Recyclable | Medium–High | Premium produce boxes, deep-draw containers |
| PP | ★★☆☆☆ (Low transparency) | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ (Flexible) | Food-grade | Good | Recyclable | Low | Vegetable trays, microwaveable packaging |
| PS | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ (Easy forming but brittle) | ★★☆☆☆ | Declining acceptance | Poor (brittle in cold) | Low (not eco-favored) | Very low | Low-cost trays, limited fruit packaging |
| PLA | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ (Heat-sensitive) | ★★★☆☆ | Food-safe | Limited (poor cold-chain resistance) | Biodegradable | High | Compostable packaging, eco markets |
Why PET and RPET Are Best Suited for Fresh Produce Packaging
PET and RPET offer the ideal balance of performance and sustainability.
1. Superior Transparency and Gloss
High clarity enhances shelf appeal and consumer confidence, especially for berries and premium fruits.
2. Strong Structure and Impact Resistance
Reduces breakage during:
- Harvest handling
- Transportation
- Retail stocking
3. Excellent Cold-Chain Compatibility
PET maintains strength and avoids brittleness even at low temperatures.
4. Widely Recognized Food Safety Standards
Compliant with:
- FDA
- EU No.10/2011
- GB 4806.7-2016
5. Recyclable and Sustainability-Driven
RPET supports:
- Lower carbon emissions
- European PCR requirements
- Supermarket sustainability commitments
PET/RPET is the most future-proof material for produce packaging.
Common Packaging Designs and Recommended Materials
1. Ventilated Thermoformed Clamshells
- For strawberries, blueberries, cherry tomatoes
- PET / RPET is ideal due to clarity + airflow
2. Anti-Fog PET Packaging
- Prevents water condensation in cold-chain
- Maintains visibility and prevents fogging


3. High-Transparency Display Boxes
- For premium fruit sets
- Best performance from high-clarity PET
4. Hinged-Lid Clamshell Containers
- Precise molding, strong locking mechanism
- PET ensures dimensional stability
Key Technical Indicators When Purchasing PET / RPET Sheets
When evaluating PET & RPET suppliers, consider:
1. Transparency & Gloss
Higher clarity = stronger retail impression.
2. Impact Strength & Rigidity
Critical for stacking and transport safety.
3. Thickness Uniformity
Ensures consistent thermoforming results.
4. Food-Grade Certification
The supplier should provide:
- FDA
- EU 10/2011
- Migration test reports
5. Thermoforming Performance
Good heating response, stable wall distribution.
Cost Comparison of PET RPET PP PS PLA
| Material | Cost | Transparency | Sustainability | Recommended Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET | Medium | ★★★★★ | Recyclable | Premium clamshells |
| RPET | Low–Medium | ★★★★☆ | Recycled material | Export packaging |
| PP | Low | ★★☆☆☆ | Recyclable | Vegetable trays |
| PS | Very low | ★★☆☆☆ | Declining use | Low-cost packaging |
| PLA | High | ★★★☆☆ | Biodegradable | Specialty eco markets |
RPET offers the best balance of performance + sustainability + cost.
Global Sustainability & Regulatory Trends
Regulations worldwide are pushing for recycled content:
- EU: Minimum 25–30% recycled content for packaging
- USA: Several states require 15–20% PCR materials
- Retailers: Walmart, Costco, Tesco, and Carrefour request RPET packaging
PET & RPET align perfectly with these long-term policies.
How to Choose the Right Material for Your Business
For Export-Oriented Packaging
✔ RPET (80–100%)
✔ Choose A-grade RPET for high transparency
For Domestic Retail & Cold-Chain
✔ PET or PET/RPET mix
For Cost-Sensitive Applications
✔ PP
For High-End Fruit Gift Boxes
✔ Ultra-clear PET
Conclusion: PET & RPET Are the Future of Produce Thermoforming Packaging
PET and RPET have become the global standard for fruit and vegetable thermoforming packaging thanks to their unmatched combination of transparency, safety, strength, and recyclability. They meet modern supply-chain demands and support environmental goals, while also being cost-effective and widely accepted by global retailers.
As sustainability regulations continue to tighten worldwide, PET & RPET thermoforming sheets will play an even more critical role in the future of produce packaging.
FAQ
Q1. Why PET / RPET dominate fresh fruit packaging?
✔ Highest clarity
✔ Strong rigidity
✔ Excellent cold-chain performance
✔ Globally accepted standards
✔ RPET aligns with sustainability policiesQ2. Why GAG is a premium option?
✔ Deep forming without whitening
✔ PETG-like clarity with lower material cost
✔ Ideal for complex box designsQ3. Why PP/PS/PLA are secondary choices for fruit packaging?
PP – durable but not clear
PS – cheap but fragile
PLA – green but expensive & heat-sensitiveQ4. How thick are fruit and vegetable trays typically?
Strawberry container: Recommended thickness: 0.35–0.55mm; Material: PET / RPET;
Grape container: Recommended thickness: 0.45–0.65mm; Material: PET;
Mushroom tray: Recommended thickness: 0.5–0.8mm; Material: PS / HIPS;
Vegetable container: Recommended thickness: 0.4–0.6mm; Material: PP;Q5. Does RPET affect transparency?
RPET can affect transparency. Recycled flakes may contain tiny impurities or a light tint, so RPET sheets are often a bit less clear than 100% virgin PET. High-grade RPET and better filtration can improve clarity, but it’s still usually not as crystal-clear.
Why choose us?
- Annual production capacity of over 40,000 tons
- Food-grade dust-free workshop
- High-transparency extrusion technology
- Capable of producing PET, RPET, GAG, PETG, PP, and PS/HIPS
- Stable supply chain and fast delivery
- Customizable parameters based on customer’s fruit and vegetable packaging box molds
